Private & Confidential · Qualified Investors Only
[ glassbox ]PROJECT

AI that shows its work. And stays where you put it.

What follows is the complete flow: on the left, what you would see in the room.
On the right, why it is built that way.

advance with scroll · arrows · or the button below

01 · The problem

AI writes the draft. A person still has to prove it.

What you see
Fully manual100
AI without proof78
Glassbox22
Cost of getting work approved · indexed, illustrative
Why it matters
The checking was always the cost.

In regulated work the draft was never expensive — the verification was. AI without proof removes almost none of it.

So the pilot dies.

A qualified person redoes the AI's work "to be safe". The company pays for the AI and keeps the cost of the person.

02 · What we built

The work and the proof, produced together.

What you see

Sourced

Click any claim — the document opens at the exact page.

Recorded

Every step written down, immutably. Nobody can change it.

Enforced

Policy stops the action before it happens — never a report afterwards.

Why it matters
The audit file is a by-product.

One runtime does the work, applies the rules and writes the evidence as a single event. The check becomes a look, not a repeat.

Assembled-afterwards logs fail.

A log stitched together after the fact never survives inspection. Evidence born with the work does.

03 · Determinism

Same question, same answer. Not AI slop.

What you see
RAW FOUNDATION MODEL3 RUNS · 3 ANSWERS

> assess: is claim #4121 within policy?

run 1 · "likely covered, subject to…"

run 2 · "coverage is doubtful because…"

run 3 · "covered. (confidence: high)"

GLASSBOX RUNTIME3 RUNS · 1 ANSWER

> assess: is claim #4121 within policy?

run 1 · WITHIN POLICY · §4.2(b) · hash 8f3a21c4

run 2 · WITHIN POLICY · §4.2(b) · hash 8f3a21c4

run 3 · WITHIN POLICY · §4.2(b) · hash 8f3a21c4

Why it matters
An answer that changes cannot be signed.

A regulator calls variance an uncontrolled process. It cannot be validated, sampled by a supervisor, or carry a signature.

Reproducible = approvable.

Pinned retrieval, numbers computed outside the model, deterministic gates. Same inputs, same hash — on demand, years later. That is what model-validation teams can approve.

04 · The numbers

Measured. Not promised.

What you see
0
faster document review
26 s vs 92 min
+0
more accurate than
trained professionals
$0
saved per professional
per month
0 of 34
vendors assessed can run
fully offline — we are one
Why it matters
Benchmarks you can audit.

Each figure comes from measured deployments, with the evaluation method and baselines available in diligence — not from a vendor slide.

The offline number is the moat.

Thirty-four vendors assessed across twenty-nine axes. The ability to run with no internet at all decides who may even bid in sovereign procurement.

05 · Grounded & stamped

Anchored to facts. Stamped for the regulator.

What you see
EVIDENCE RECORD · ANATOMY#8f3a21c4
Claim"reinstatement value within policy limit"
GroundingPolicySchedule_2024.pdf · p.47 ¶2
Computationreserve delta — outside the model
Approvalm.lindqvist · named, timestamped
Integrityhash-chained · immutable
AI Act Art. 12Art. 13Art. 14Art. 15DORA
Why it matters
DORA

Operational resilience, ICT third-party control and auditability — already binding on the EU financial sector.

In force since January 2025
EU AI Act — high-risk

Record-keeping, transparency, human oversight and accuracy become legal requirements. Every record is pre-mapped to the articles an examiner will cite.

Applies 2 December 2027
06 · The stack we own

Your work never trains someone else's model.

What we own

Our own small language models

Built for regulated, constrained and sovereign environments — not a wrapper on a frontier API.

Memory engine

Context and KV-cache compression — roughly 2× more model per unit of hardware. It makes on-premise affordable.

A model-building pipeline

Train → distill → evaluate → deploy, in-house. Withdraw a source, and we prove the model no longer carries it.

Why it matters
The API path leaks by design.

Prompt leaves the perimeter → vendor logs → retention and training policies you don't control. A regulated institution's work product is not training data.

Ours stays inside.

Own models on your substrate: nothing leaves, nothing is trained on, and deletion is demonstrated — not promised.

07 · Try it yourself

One runtime. Any substrate. Switch it live.

What you do
Glassbox runtime — workflow #4121Network: Connected
Substrate

Amazon Web Services

Your AWS account, our full stack inside it — dedicated VPC, your KMS keys, no shared tenancy, EU region.

EVIDENCE STREAM — HASH-CHAINEDSUBSTRATE: AWS / EU-NORTH
chain intact — 0 records · 0 switches · 0 breaks
Why it matters
No cloud lock-in, no vendor lock-in.

The same runtime, byte for byte, on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud — always in your account, with your keys — or on a sealed appliance in your building.

The chain survives the move.

Watch the record numbering: migration carries the state and the evidence chain unbroken. Your audit history is never hostage to a substrate.

Then select the appliance.

An unplug button appears. Press it. The network is severed — and the evidence keeps writing. That is the whole thesis in one gesture.

08 · The appliance

For when the regulator asks where the data sleeps.

What you see
GLASSBOX · SEALED UNIT · NO EGRESS
Why it matters
No egress, by construction.

Ships sealed, deploys itself, nothing configured to call home. Updates arrive signed, by hand. Evidence leaves only when you carry it.

Same runtime as the cloud.

A workflow built on AWS this morning runs here this afternoon — chain intact. For banks under residency law, defence, health, and anyone whose supervisor has learned to ask.

09 · The reception

Why regulated institutions love it.

What they say
Head of model risk

"Deterministic, reproducible, evaluable — finally something my validation framework can approve."

Internal audit

"The audit file exists by construction. I sample records, not promises."

Data protection officer

"Where does the prompt go? Nowhere. That is a one-sentence DPIA."

CISO

"They asked me to unplug the network during the demo. Nobody has ever asked me that."

Why it matters
It speaks their control language.

The system is organised the way regulated institutions are examined — so every gatekeeper in the buying chain recognises their own framework in it.

Shaped where it is hardest.

Developed and validated with the organisations below. Details under NDA.

Global audit-network firmsA national insurance groupSystemic banksA European institution
The invitation

See it with the cable out.

A small number of Nordic investors are being invited into a private process ahead of a financing round. First conversation under NDA — then we demo, live, exactly what this page simulates.

Vlatko Kotevski
Project Glassbox conversation · 45 minutes · Microsoft Teams
Live Outlook Auto-confirmed
SMTWTFS
Choose a day

Open times come from Outlook. Busy hours stay hidden. Confirmation stays on this page.

Questions only: vlatko.kotevski@adamass.se

This page intentionally contains no company-identifying information. All figures are measured results; supporting evidence is available in diligence.

Project Glassbox · Private & Confidential · Not an offer of securities · October 2026
Vlatko Kotevski · vlatko.kotevski@adamass.se
01 / 11